Author Archives: William Bolin

RESURRECTION EVIDENCE

THE HISTORICAL EVIDENCE OF THE RESURRECTION

Persuasive presentation of Gospel information composes the necessary portfolio requirements for the communicators of the divine Word.

Transformational enactment at the personal level of belief acquisition is the desired end of linguistic projections via biblical evidence. Language values comprise Holy Writs propositions.

God has entertained languages limitations, overcoming the problematic contingencies and validating His Words empowerment. God has acted historically, including Himself into the narrative of humanity. Through inclusionary action, that which exists outside special considerations is referenced within the space/time continuum. Equivocal expressions denounce theories of fabrication or mythological assumptions concerning Christianities origins.

To claim Jesus didn’t exist historically for lack of conclusive proof is to dismiss Plato, Aristotle, Euripides, and a host of other ancient figures, to the same fate, or even worse.

Emperors, historians and sages in or around the time of Christ allude to His veracity. The Gospel accounts record the ruminations of followers of Jesus who had lost faith momentarily, only to undergo a reinvigoration following supra-naturalism’s incorporation into their tribal language.

Christ rose from the dead and they witnessed this present reality. Jewish and Roman desires to extinguish the messages languages focus: God exists and lived among us could not be curtailed. Ancient gullibility’s aside, those who encountered the Christ and acted errantly in an experiential modality would never be the same again.

Factual evidentiary composites exist for ruminations value in perpetuity. The message of God’s language forces a merging of certainty. His truth that transcends idealism has unequivocally entered into the communal boundaries of all humankind.

Skeptical considerations of the essential nature of Christ do exist, yet the facts remain. The enemies of Jesus could not advance plausible theories of deniability in their time period. This is a significant factor in faith’s analysis. Discrepancies function in the theoretical denigration of Jesus’ authenticity, in Word and in works. Still, the irreducible essence of Christ’s qualities remains.

Jesus rose from the dead.

Those who abandoned Him, rejected Him, and denied, him at His moment of divine excellence in humiliation were altered. The qualitative realities of Christ morphed these men into irretractable apologists, with all but one of these disciples encountering martyrdom as the exiting stage from this reality into the next sphere of existence. While faith’s acceptance is a matter of subjective variables, the objective validaters of Christian faith compose a presumption that is accurate and worthy of consideration.